Russell Kirkpatrick's Journal
Learning by Correspondence
17-Nov-2006
Anyone ever successfully completed a course by correspondence?
My younger son Alex is in his penultimate year at school (year 12). He wanted to do Geography (bless him). But they only offered it by correspondence because it clashed with his drama class.
So. The material arrived late or never. He couldn't be bothered if the administrators couldn't be bothered. It all ground to a halt. His exam is next week. So I'm giving him a crash course.
And I'm discovering just how appalling secondary school geography is. It's mired in the 1980s - there's been no curriculum review since 1990. This is not the fault of the teachers - the Ministry of Education has left the subject out to dry. Alex is having to learn stuff that academics abandoned thirty years ago.
It makes me angry. But then most things make me angry these days.
Then, I did my bookkeeping qualification via correspondence, and did that just fine. The difference? The grad cert was at a very high level of information and ideas, because it was a grad cert. The bookkeeping course, however, was very basic info, from the very beginning, and I was able to accept it that way.
High School, however, would be a different thing entirely. A) there's a real power to teacher-student interaction. And B) parents shouldn't know too much about what's happening in school, particularly in an area they are an expert in :)
PS. Have enjoyed reading your posts on the frustrations of assembling your shed!