Russell Kirkpatrick's Journal
'Sensible' Sentencing
26-Dec-2007
I've been thinking about the good and bad in 2007. One of the worst of the year is Garth McVicar's so-called 'Sensible Sentencing Trust', set up to advocate for victims' rights.
Now if that was all the Trust occupied itself doing, I'd have no problem. But they consistently act as a political lobby group, trying to convince politicians (who are vulnerable on this issue) to give tougher sentences.
Today (Boxing Day in New Zealand) is supposed to be 'white rose' day, where people are encouraged to wear white roses to remember the victims of recidivist drunk drivers. In actuality, it crates a platform for McVicar to witter on about the much tougher penalties these people deserve. Clever. Boxing Day is a 'no-news' day, which is why he chose it. This group is dangerously politically savvy.
The problem is, tougher prison sentences cost this country in a variety of ways, and never do any good. 'Oh, but if a recidivist drunk driver is in jail, (s)he isn't on the road killing people'. True. But a lifetime disqualification would achieve the same result, and allow the putative prisoner to contribute to society rather than costing us upwards of $100,000 per year to incarcerate.
But what about the right of victims to see the criminal punished? Sorry, but it is society that sends someone to jail. The victim has no more right to exact punishment than the rest of us, and that is as it should be. And punishment is only part of what is required to deal with someone committing a criminal offence.
Think. A hundred recidivist drunk drivers in jail for (say) two years longer than normal, as a result of McVicar succeeding, costs the taxpayers twenty million dollars extra. This is money that would be better spent on education or policing. Don't put people in jail when a less extreme measure will remove the risk they pose. Instead, keep them in society. I'm in favour of requiring them to work for the community, or even their victim. Constructive solutions come from a desire to redeem; destructive solutions from the desire to punish. We should take a leaf out of Finland's book and minimise our prison population to those whose freedom would pose a risk to society.
McVicar claims we've been part of a 'liberal experiment'. I don't think we've been nearly liberal enough. Find other ways to heal yourself than 'an eye for an eye'. Think outside the square. Remember the victims, yes, but don't forget the needs of society in your desire for revenge. And whenever the Sensible Sentencing Trust appear on the media, how about listening to them with a little more skepticism?
I contributed my 2 cents worth so now we can chat amongst ourselves...did you have a nice Christmas? My daughter got Barbie dolls so I've been re-living my childhood *grin*.
Seriously - you reckon that's bad? You ought to come and live here for a year or two. Then you would discover what asinine policy is.
Russell, just wait until I get me a model of the Millenium Falcon and an X-Wing fighter, then you won't be so cocky!!! "Stay on target...stay on target!"
(I have seen that movie waaay too many times *grin*)
Heh, Jo. I have a couple of Millennium Falcons, but not the biggie - a 5000-piece, $1000 set, the largest in the Lego range. Maybe next Christmas. Though it won't fit in the Death Star's 'Beggar's Canyon'. (Always thought there was something disturbingly Freudian about the end of the original Star Wars - or, at least, there's a sperm fertilising egg thing going on.)
So we will have to watch as he garners more power, among the media and the politicians, and helps the process of seducing the swing vote to the dark-side.
oh and I'm not allowed the lego in my house... :-)
There's no telling how bitter I'd be if I'd been through the violent death of a loved one. But ultimately their cause, while understandable, is selfish. We need to do what's best for all parties involved.
Now I am increasingly concerned that Mr Key will get into power and stuff this issue up, as well as a number of other issues.
Oh and I have come to the conclusion that I must have been Hitler or someone else suitably evil... My son gets the Lego and Mama is not allowed to play, unless he requires more dexterity than his four year old hands can currently perform. Then, so long as his Daddy is at work, I am allowed to touch the hallowed toy! I don't mind as long as I get the books.